![slavery big gay meme slavery big gay meme](https://news.berkeley.edu/wp-content/uploads/2019/10/StephanieJonesRogers750.jpg)
“ slave-ship captains wanted to deal with ruling groups and strong leaders, people who could command labor resources and deliver the ‘goods,’ ” Rediker writes, and European money and technology further empowered those who were already dominant, encouraging them to enslave greater numbers. But European demand changed the shape of this market, strengthening enslavers and ensuring that more and more people would be carried away. Yes, European slave traders entered “preexisting circuits of exchange” when they arrived in the 16 th century. But, as historian Marcus Rediker writes, the “ancient and widely accepted institution” of enslavement in Africa was exacerbated by the European presence. Tribal chieftains often sold their defeated foes to white slave-traders.”
![slavery big gay meme slavery big gay meme](https://i0.wp.com/hyperallergic-newspack.s3.amazonaws.com/uploads/2020/11/Anti-Slavery-Poster-©-Public-domain.jpg)
One of his salvos: “Slavery was common throughout Africa, with entire tribes becoming enslaved after losing battles.
SLAVERY BIG GAY MEME SERIES
In a piece published in Vice magazine in 2005 (and still available on the Vice website), comedian Jim Goad offers a series of “feel better about your history, white kids” arguments. Neither of the authors “bother to inform the reader, in a coherent manner, what the differences are between chattel slavery and indentured servitude or forced labor,” writes Hogan. Hogan cites several writers-Sean O’Callaghan in To Hell or Barbados and Don Jordan and Michael Walsh in White Cargo: The Forgotten History of Britain’s White Slaves in America-who exaggerate poor treatment of Irish indentured servants and intentionally conflate their status with African slaves. More recently, Hogan notes, several sources have conflated indentured servitude with chattel slavery in order to argue for a particular Irish disadvantage in the Americas, when compared to other white immigrant groups. The term “white slaves” emerged in the 17 th and 18 th centuries, first as a derogatory term for Irish laborers-equating their social position to that of slaves-later as political rhetoric in Ireland itself, and later still as Southern pro-slavery propaganda against an industrialized North. Which raises a question: Where did the myth of Irish slavery come from? A few places. And in an August obituary of civil rights leader Julian Bond, the Times called his great-grandmother Jane Bond “the slave mistress of a Kentucky farmer”-a term that accords far too much agency to Bond’s ancestor and too little blame to the “farmer” who enslaved her. Lee that was otherwise largely critical of the Confederate general, New York Times op-ed columnist David Brooks wrote that, though Lee owned slaves, he didn’t like owning slaves-a biographical detail whose inclusion seemed to imply that Lee’s ambivalence somehow made his slaveholding less objectionable. In a June column on the legacy of Robert E. Last year, in an unsigned (and now withdrawn) review of historian Ed Baptist’s book The Half Has Never Been Told, the Economist took issue with Baptist’s “overstated” treatment of the topic, arguing that the increase in the country’s economic output in the 19 th century shouldn’t be chalked up to black workers’ innovations in the cotton field but rather to masters treating their slaves well out of economic self-interest-a bit of seemingly rational counterargument that ignores the moral force of Baptist’s narrative, while making space for the fantasy of kindly slavery. A certain resistance to discussion about the toll of American slavery isn’t confined to the least savory corners of the Internet.